EGARDENING 

Resources and tidbits


Waldsteina fragarioides

What's in a name?
Part 1: A brief introduction to plant identification
by Catherine Kavassalis

JULIET:
     'Tis but thy name that is my enemy;
     Thou art thyself, though not a Montague.
     What's Montague? it is nor hand, nor foot,
     Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part
     Belonging to a man. O, be some other name!
     What's in a name? that which we call a rose
     By any other name would smell as sweet*

From Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, 1594:


Waldsteinia ternata

As was the case for Juliet, for many of us the name of a particular plant in the garden makes little difference. We enjoy the look, smell, feel of a plant and that is enough. From that perspective, it is hard to imagine the obsession of the Swedish scientist, Carl Linnaeus, (1707-1778), who spend much of his life classifying and naming plants and animals. By 1753, Linnaeus had published the two volume Species Plantarum in which he carefully documented some 6000 species of plants. While I can not imagine spending my days characterizing plants, the Linnaean system is most useful.

Linnaeus grouped plants within a Kingdom, Vegetabilia, and divided that kingdom into classes, orders, genera and species. Within this heirarchy, Linnaeus gave long descriptive names to each plant. For instance, the tomato was described as Solanum caule inermi herbaceo foliis pinnatis incisis, racemis simplicibus meaning this plant belonged to the nightshade genus (Solanum) and was characterized by an having an herbaceous spineless stem, pinnately incised leaves, and simple racemes (flowers with short stalks). As you might imagine, Linnaeus soon replaced this cumbersome naming system with short binomial names or nomina trivialia. The tomato became Solanum lycopersicum (lyco - wolf;  persicum - peach-like). (While it is known that the Brazilian wolf apple, Solanum lycocarpum, are eaten by Maned wolves, it is not know if this is the origin of the wolf reference.1) This simple naming system, with italicized genus name first (first letter capitalized) and the species name second (all lowercase), remains a standard today.

Now if you've been to a nursery lately, you will see dozens of varieties of tomatoes like 'Big Boy' or 'Beafsteak'. These are appended to the name, e.g. S. lycopersicum 'Red Brandywine'. In places like Ecuador and Chili, there are naturally occurring variations like S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme. Of course there are also many relatives of the tomato like our eggplant, Solanum melongena L. (The L. at the end denotes that Linnaeus named this plant - you may see other letters or names referencing the authority who identified the plant appended to a name.)  I should mention that although, Linnaeus had named the tomato in 1753, another authority renamed it in 1768 as Lycopersicon esculentum Miller (this name means edible wolf-peach). It is Miller's name for the tomato that has actually been in use in the scientific literature for some 200 years. It is only recently that genetic research reshuffled the plant back into the nightshade genus.

No wonder we use the Nahuatl name (old Aztec), tomato.

Although learning the binomial names for plants can be a challenge, it can also help you understand relationships between plants and help you predict cultural requirements as well as disease and pest susceptibility. It can also prevent confusion among common names. At our recent plant sale, we debated how to organize plants. Should sea holly be sorted under S for sea, H for holly or E for Eryngium? In some instances, we had plants under a variety of letters to help people locate them. For species with many common names like our native Nyssa sylvatica (e.g. Sour Gum, Black Gum, Black Tupelo, Pepperidge), knowing the scientific name can be quite helpful.

I will end this note with an apology to whoever bought the Waldsteina or barren strawberry I offered at the plant sale. While I purchased the plant believing it was our native W. fragarioides, it is now in bloom in my garden and is almost certainly the more attractive European W. ternata. I see this often in plants marketed as native and it is a problem from the prospective of maintaining biodiversity and preserving local gene pools. While the appearance of plants may be quite similar, subtle differences in genetics give the plants quite different properties within an ecosystem. For instance, many cousins in the tomato family bear fruit, but they are not safe to eat because of their high solanum content. Ah well, W. ternata makes a lovely ground cover and I am certainly enjoying its cheery yellow blooms.

May toads nestle in your flower beds and help you tend your beauties this spring.


 

Resources and Interesting Tidbits

Some taxonomy basics:

The basic categories for classifying plants are: Domain, Kingdom, Phylum, Class, Order, Family, Tribe, Genus, Section, Series, Species, Variety (or Cultivar). The physical features of plants become more and more similar as one proceeds to finer levels of classification. 

One of many pneumonics to remember this particular organizational structure is: Daring Kangaroos Play Cellos, Orangutans Fiddle, The Gorillas Sings Special Songs. (Variants on the primary seven groups include: "Karen, please come over for great sex;" "King Philip came over for great sex;" etc.)

Linnaeus originally defined three Kingdoms (including Mineralia for minerals) which have evolved over time as our understanding of genetics have improved, (see Phylogenomics). Here is a helpful table showing the historical progression of kingdoms:

Kingdom

The Plant Kingdom or Plantae is a group whose members are today defined by the presence of green chloroplasts containing chlorophyll and carotinoid pigments and are able to create energy using light and minerals.

Plant Divisions or Phyla:

Phylum names traditionally end in phyta. As with kingdoms, these divisions or phyla are evolving and the members shifting as our knowledge and genetic techniques improve. The initial four divisions: Thallophyta (bacteria, algae, fungi), Bryophyta (mosses and liverworts, Pteridophyta (ferns and cubmosses) and Spermatophyta (seed plants: gymnosperms and angiosperms) have been split and expanded and there is debate about these divisions. The groupings are largely based on reproductive characteristics and tissue structure. This table below is from the Wiki on Phylum (see Wiki Ansers on Plant phylum or UCMP Berkeley for a different scheme: http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/help/index/plantae.html)

Division

Meaning

Common name

Distinguishing characteristics

Anthocerotophyta

 Flower-horn plants

 Hornworts

 Horn-shaped sporophytes, no vascular system

Bryophyta

 Moss plants

 Mosses

 Persistent unbranched sporophytes, no vascular system

Marchantiophyta

(Hepaticophyta UCMP)

 Marchantia plants

 Liverworts

 Ephemeral unbranched sporophytes, no vascular system

Lycopodiophyta

Wolf foot plants

Clubmosses & Spikemosses

Microphyll leaves, vascular system

Pteridophyta

Fern plants

Ferns & Horsetails

Prothallus gametophytes, vascular system

Pteridospermatophyta

 

Fern with seeds plant

Seed ferns

Only known from fossils, mostly Devonian, ranking in dispute[9]

Pinophyta

Sap/pitch plants

Conifers

Cones containing seeds and wood composed of tracheids

Cycadophyta

Palm plants

Cycads

Seeds, crown of compound leaves

Ginkgophyta

Ginkgo plants

Ginkgo, Maidenhair

Seeds not protected by fruit (single species)

Gnetophyta

None

Gnetophytes

Seeds and woody vascular system with vessels

Anthophyta (or Magnoliophyta)

 Flower plant

Flowering plants

Flowers and fruit, vascular system with vessels

Classes

The division Ginkgophyta is by far the simplest as there are so few members (There are seven principle genera: Baiera†, Ginkgo, Ginkgoites†, Ginkgoïdium†, Phoenicpsis†, Polyspermophyllum†, Trichopitys† with only one living species). Thus the division has one class: Ginkgoopsida (classes typically end in -sida); one order: Ginkgoales (orders typically end in -ales) and one family: Ginkgoaceae (families typically end in -ceae).  There is some debate however that the order Ginkgoales should be placed in a different class. As ginkgoes have reproductive structures similar to that of the cycads that could be classed within Cycadophyta. Alternatively they share vegetative morphology of the conifers and could be classed within Pinophyta. The solution was to give them a class unto themselves, for now, (see UCMP Systematics http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/seedplants/ginkgoales/ginkgosy.html )

In the largest complex phylum, Anthrophyta previously called Magnoliophyta (flowering plants), classification becomes even more contentious. The flowering plants have historically been divided into two Classes based on the number of cotyledons on the embryo. Those flowering plants with two cotyledons are called dicots while those with only one are called monocots (see UCMP Berkeley  Discussion of Classes). Systematists argue for more classes, different classes and more levels. For simplicity sake, there are two classes:

Within classes, are Orders which organize finer detail. It is a subjective art choosing which characteristics to consider forming into a groups. While there is much debate on this organization, here is one useful classification structure.

Orders in Class Monocotyledoneae
(NatureServe list)

 Orders in Class Dicotyledoneae
(NatureServe list2)

Alismatales
Arales
Arecales
Bromeliales
Commelinales
Cyperales
Eriocaulales
Hydrocharitales
Juncales
Liliales
Najadales
Orchidales
Pandanales
Restionales
Typhales
Zingiberales

Apiales
Aristolochiales
Asterales
Batales
Callitrichales
Calycerales
Campanulales
Capparales
Caryophyllales
Casuarinales
Celastrales
Cornales
Diapensiales
Dilleniales
Dipsacales
Ebenales
Ericales

 

Euphorbiales
Fabales
Fagales
Gentianales
Geraniales
Haloragales
Hamamelidales
Illiciales
Juglandales
Lamiales
Laurales
Leitneriales
Linales
Magnoliales
Malvales
Myricales
Myrtales
 

Nepenthales
Nymphaeales
Papaverales
Piperales
Plantaginales
Plumbaginales
Podostemales
Polygalales
Polygonales
Primulales
Proteales
Rafflesiales
Ranunculales
Rhamnales
Rhizophorales
Rosales

"The APG II system does not assign the monocots to a taxonomic rank, instead recognizing a monocots clade. This system recognizes ten orders of monocots and two families of monocots not yet assigned to any order" (Wiki Monocots see discussion of Cladistics)

Family

Once again, both vegetative and reproductive features are used to characterize families, e.g. kind and number of pistils, stamens, carpal, fruit type, flower and leaf form, etc. With few exceptions, family names end in -ceae. Families often share similar cultural requirements and are prone to similar diseases and pests. For instance, insects coevolved with plants. As the flowering plants, Anthophyta, underwent divergence so to did herbivores and pollinators. Thus if we want to attract beneficial predatory insects to the garden we should select plants with short flower tubes, e.g. carrot family (Apiaceae  syn. Umbelliferae), mustard family (Brassicaceae), mint family (Lamiaceae) and aster family (Asteraceae). Disease susceptibility can also be predicted across families although there will be some members with greater resistance and often disease and pest pressures select for and shape the development of the various genera.

Genus

The differences between members of a genus become more subtle. They will share similarities in physical characteristics that belie their common genetics. However, it is sometimes discovered that the physical characteristics are coincidental, in which case members will be shifted and to other groupings. For instance, the goldenrods were once lumped together within the genus Solidago. It was recently found that the Grass-leaved Goldenrods were not that closely related and have been moved to the genus Euthamia (see for instance John Semple Goldenrods).

 Similarity of flowers and fruits is the most widely used feature, although roots, stems, buds, and leaves are also used. Common names typically apply to genera. For example Hemerocallis is the genus of daylilies, Acer is the genus of maples, and Viburnum the genus of viburnum. (Note when a genus name is used as a common name, it is not capitalized).

Species

Species are a group of plants that conform to certain fixed properties. Naturally occurring populations interbreed at maturity and sustain these properties. While there may be clusters of variations or phenotypes, they are sufficiently similar to be grouped together. Modern genetic techniques have been helpful to define particular genotypes associated with specific species. (See Wiki on Species and Species Problem).
 

Species naming conventions

Common names are lower case unless the word is derived from a surname or proper noun, e.g. tomato, Kentucky coffee tree, black-eyed Susan, Douglas fir, etc. Botanical names are often used as common names in which case they are set in lower case and not italicized, e.g. rhododendron, hosta, iris, etc.

Botanical names for a given species are given as genus name or abbreviation followed by species name and variety name as follows.

  • Genus names are italicized and the first letter capitalized, e.g. Solanum

  • Species name follows the genus name and is italicized an given in lower case Solanum lycopersicum or S. lycopersicum

  • Sometimes, the plant name is followed by the abbreviated name of the individual who first named the plant - the "authority."  This can be designated by a letter or the name, e.g.

  • Quercus alba L. here the the letter "L" is used to identify Linnaeus as the authority or Acer saccharum Marsh where Humphrey Marshal is recognized as the name's author. 
  • Sub-species, varieties, and form (f) names must consist of only lower-case letters and must be printed in italics (or underscored). The sub-division names, or their abbreviations, must never be italicized – eg. Gleditsia triacanthos var. inermis, Drosera binata ssp. multifida f. extrema.

  • The cultivar name is capitalized and enclosed in single quotes e.g. Solanum lycopersicum 'Big Boy' or S. lycopersicum 'Big Boy' or if there is no ambiguity, S. Big Boy'

Hybrids

(The following is excerted from Glenn L. Roberts University of Guelph Lecture on Taxonomy)

A hybrid is the offspring of two plants from different taxa (different species, genera, family, etc.). For example, an intergeneric hybrid is a hybrid between species of two different genera. An interspecific hybrid is a hybrid between two different species of the same genus.

Take the example of a cross between the two species Salix aurita L and Salix caprea L. The hybrid name would be:

Salix aurita L X S. caprea L. (this is naming according to a formulae)

Naming according to a formal name would be the example of the cross between Quercus alba L. and Quercus michauxii Nutt.

Quercus X beadlei Trel. (this is naming according to a formal name)

As you can see, naming of hybrids is a bit more complicated, but both forms shown above are acceptable according to the ICBN and you will see both used in books and catalogues. The important thing to note is that in either naming convention an “X” is used to depict the hybrid designation. This is the thing to watch out for. If you see the “X”, you know that it is a hybrid between two plants. However, the name does not always tell what the two plants are (as in the Quercus example).

(The following is excerted from Bob & Lynn Wellenstein Names and Naming.) 

There are two different but related sets of rules for plant nomenclature. Plants growing in their native habitat are named under The International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (ICBN), and plants cultivated and hybridized by humans are named under the rules of The International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants.

...take [the slipper orchid]  Paph. glaucophyllum var. moquettianum 'Candor Rose Gold' AM/AOS and cross it with Paph. adductum 'Candor Wildwood' HCC/AOS. The cross, if unregistered, would be listed capsule parent first and pollen parent second separated by an "x" as (Paph. glaucophyllum var. moquettianum 'Candor Rose Gold' AM/AOS x Paph. adductum 'Candor Wildwood' HCC/AOS). As it happens this cross has already been made and flowered, and was named as Paph. Bianka by H. Doll in 1990. It should be noted at this point that if the reciprocal cross were made, that is (Paph. adductum x Paph. glaucophyllum) it will still be considered the same cross and named Paph. Bianka. The same applies if the cross is made with different parental clones, any cross of either Paph. glaucophyllum or Paph. moquettianum with Paph. adductum, regardless of clones used, or which was capsule and which was the pollen parent, will be Paph. Bianka. Also note that if a plant of Paph. Bianka is selfed or crossed with another plant of Paph. Bianka, the resultant progeny will also be considered Paph. Bianka. The flower pictured is Paph. Bianka 'Candor Autumn Tapestry' AM/AOS. As you can see, there are a few different rules for writing hybrid names. First, they are not italicized or underlined, and secondly, all words are capitalized."

 

 Interesting tidbits

a rose by any other name...

"A story, much favoured by tour guides, and as such highly suspect, is that in this line Shakespeare was also making a joke at the expense of the Rose Theatre. The Rose was a local rival to his Globe Theatre and is reputed to have had less than effective sanitary arrangements. The story goes that this was a coy joke about the smell. This certainly has the whiff of folk etymology about it, but it might just be true." The Phrase Finder http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/305250.html

Linnaeus

"In Linnaeus' time, most Swedes had no surnames. Linnaeus' grandfather was named Ingemar Bengtsson (son of Bengt), following the long-standing Scandinavian tradition of sons' bearing, as surnames, their fathers' given names with -son>-son appended; Linnaeus' father was known as Nils Ingemarsson (son of Ingemar). Only for registration purposes, for example when matriculating at a university, one needed a surname. In the academic world, Latin was the language of choice, so when Linnaeus' father went to the University of Lund, he coined himself a Latin surname: Linnaeus, referring to a large linden (lime) tree, the warden tree of the family property Linnagård (linn being an archaic form of Swedish lind, the linden). Nils Ingemarsson Linnaeus gave his son the name Carl. So the Swedish name of the boy was Carl Linnaeus." Carolus Linnaeus Wiki hhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolus_Linnaeus

References:

Taxonomy references:

Cladistics

Naming Plants

Wikis

Miscellaneous